Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative Sample

Jonathan Chapman, University of Bologna, Erik Snowberg, University of Utah, University of British Columbia, NBER and CESifo, Stephanie Wang, University of Pittsburgh, and Colin Camerer, California Institute of Technology

We measure individual-level loss aversion using three incentivized, representative surveys of the U.S. population (combined N = 3,000). We find that around 50% of the U.S. population is loss tolerant – they are willing to accept negative-expected-value gambles that contain a loss. This is counter to expert predictions and earlier findings which mostly come from lab/student samples that 70-90% of participants are loss averse. Consistent with the different findings in our study versus the prior literature, loss aversion is more prevalent in people with high cognitive ability. Further, our measure of gain-loss attitudes exhibits similar temporal stability and better predictive power outside our survey than measures of risk aversion. Loss-tolerant individuals are more likely to report recent gambling, investing a higher percentage of their assets in stocks, and experiencing financial shocks. These results support the general hypothesis that individuals value gains and losses differently, and that gain-loss attitudes are an important economic preference. However, the tendency in a large proportion of the population to emphasize gains over losses is an overlooked behavioral phenomenon.